Latest Threads
Latest
Greatest Threads
Greatest
Lobby
Lobby
Journals
Journals
Search
Search
Options
Options
Help
Help
Login
Login
Home » Discuss » Journals » salvorhardin » Read entry Donate to DU
Advertise Liberally! The Liberal Blog Advertising Network
Advertise on more than 70 progressive blogs!
The R Complex Cafe
Posted by salvorhardin in General Discussion
Sun Jun 29th 2008, 10:01 AM
They should have used this image of Charles Darwin if they wanted to portray an accurate matchup:


Darwin is 51 in that photo. Lincoln was 52 when he took the office of the Presidency.

I'm not sure who would come out on top in a fight between Darwin and Lincoln. Both weren't exactly known for sedentary lifestyles. Lincoln's wiry but Darwin looks tougher. Lincoln has Mary Todd to back him up, Darwin controls an army of wild monkeys.. Yeah, that's it. Lincoln and Todd easily beats Darwin and wild monkey army.
Discuss (2 comments)
Profile Information
salvorhardin
Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your ignore list
Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God? — Epicurus (341–270 B.C.), Greek philosopher
Infidel Approved
Visitor Tools
Use the tools below to keep track of updates to this Journal.
 
Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals  |  Campaigns  |  Links  |  Store  |  Donate
About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.