Latest Threads
Latest
Greatest Threads
Greatest
Lobby
Lobby
Journals
Journals
Search
Search
Options
Options
Help
Help
Login
Login
Home » Discuss » Journals » satya Donate to DU
Advertise Liberally! The Liberal Blog Advertising Network
Advertise on more than 70 progressive blogs!
satya's Journal
Posted by satya in General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009)
Sun Aug 31st 2008, 07:06 PM
McCain's been watching his "soulmate" for "many, many years" ... really? Guess he belonged to the same PTA, then. And he doesn't like that "maverick" label either, dontcha know. Regarding his VP choice:
MCCAIN: Oh, yes. She's a partner and a soul-mate. She's a reformer. I don't particularly enjoy the label "maverick," but when somebody takes on the old bulls in her own party, runs against an incumbent governor of her own party, stands up against the oil and gas interests, I mean, they really are so vital to the economy of her — of the state of Alaska. I mean, it's remarkable. It's a remarkable person.

And I've watched her record, and I've watched her for many, many years as she — as she implemented ethics and lobbying reforms. And I mean, she led on it. She didn't just vote for it. She led it. I've seen her take on her own party.

The chronology of events leading up to her selection:
MCCAIN: We had breakfast.

WALLACE: ... in February.

MCCAIN: Yes.

WALLACE: You talked to her on the phone last Sunday. And you met with her face to face — face to face for the first time to discuss the vice presidential ticket Thursday morning, and then you offered her the job. Must have been a heck of a meeting?

MCCAIN: Well, the fact is, I've been watching her.

But most importantly, Cindy okayed the selection. Wonder who she's got in mind for his Cabinet?
WALLACE: Did you want to get her approval?

SEN. JOHN MCCAIN, R-ARIZ.: Oh, yes. Very necessary.

WALLACE: And you gave her the thumbs up?

C. MCCAIN: I did.

Um, refresh my memory, Sen. McCain: what were you doing on Aug 29, 2005?
But, you know, it just — it wouldn't be appropriate to have a festive occasion while a near tragedy or a terrible challenge is presented in the form of a natural disaster. So, we're monitoring it from day to day, and I'm saying a few prayers, too.


Obama will raise your taxes!!! I'll keep 'em low because I want everybody to get rich, just like Cindy's dad! (Of course, when Mr. Hensley started his business in 1955, the top corporate tax rate was 52% and the top tax bracket was $25,000). Historical Corporate Top Tax Rate and Bracket

...and other distortions, lies and incredible remarks. Sorry to link to the Faux News website, but if you have to read it for yourself, here is the transcript: Chris Wallace interview with John McCain on this morning's show
Read entry | Discuss (11 comments) | Recommend (0 votes)
Posted by satya in General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010)
Mon Jul 23rd 2007, 12:37 PM
I wish I could tell you that you're wrong, but I can't. You see very clearly what's going on and where this country is headed if we don't change direction. I've spent my fair share of time curled up in fetal position wondering how we got to this point and what we could do.

I'm probably one of the most pessimistic, cynical people you might ever find but I'm also stubborn -- and so are a lot of other people I know. So even a crotchety old lady like me was encouraged when I started reading Gene Sharp's book Waging Nonviolent Struggle last night and ran across this:
...many people still assume that nonviolent struggle is contrary to "human nature". It is often claimed that its widespread practice would require either a fundamental change in human beings or the acceptance of a powerful new religious or ideological belief system. Those views are not supported by the reality of past conflicts that have been waged by use of this technique.

In fact, the practice of this type of struggle is not based on the belief in "turning the other cheek" or loving one's enemies. Instead, the widespread practice of this technique is more often based on the undeniable capacity of human beings to be stubborn, and to do what they want to do or to refuse to do what they are ordered, whatever their beliefs about the use or nonuse of violence. Massive stubbornness can have powerful political consequences.

It is a great privilege to be living here, now, and also a great responsibility. It is up to us to decide whether to apply the lessons of history or to bury our heads in the sand while our republic is turned into a dictatorship. IMHO, those who promote violent responses to our situation are playing right into the hands of the Powers That Be, because they are well-equipped to deal with that.

But we are not powerless.

198 methods of nonviolent action

*How Serbian students brought dictator down without a shot fired
By Peter Ackerman
National Catholic Reporter, April 26, 2002

link

<snip>
Dictators require two conditions to stay in power: the fear and acquiescence of the people they rule, and the willingness of police or security forces to follow orders and crack down on opposition. But the strategic use of nonviolent resistance can detach any dictator, however, ruthless, from both of those components of his power.

In Serbia, young people who were angry about the stagnant, hopeless society produced by Milosevic started Otpor (resistance, in Serbian). They ridiculed the president with sidewalk birthday parties, showing a cake representing Yugoslavia being carved up during Milosevic’s reign. They plastered flat surfaces all over the country with stickers that stated, “He’s finished.” Every Serb knew whom that meant -- and the belief that Milosevic could not be opposed was dissolved.

Otpor mobilized thousands of civilians in scores of Serbian cities. “Citizens finally realized that they are not objects, but subjects of politics,” said activist Stanko Lazendic. They discovered within themselves the ability and willingness to stop being submissive. And when the leaders of the movement were arrested, friends and family members went down to the police stations and stood silently outside and showed the men in uniform that the opposition had deep roots, that it wasn’t just disaffected students but whole communities that stood against the dictator.

Yet Milosevic’s foes did not assail the police or treat them as the enemy. “We couldn’t use force on someone who had three times more weapons than we did,” said Lazendic. “We knew what had happened in China, in Tiananmen.” Instead Milosevic’s foes “got under” the officers’ “skins and under their uniforms and tried to reach them somewhere deep to say, ‘Come on guys, we are together. This is our country,’ ” said Srdja Popovic, an Otpor leader.
<snip>


Read entry | Discuss (0 comments)
Greatest Threads
The ten most recommended threads posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums in the last 24 hours.
Visitor Tools
Use the tools below to keep track of updates to this Journal.
 
Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals  |  Campaigns  |  Links  |  Store  |  Donate
About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.