Latest Threads
Latest
Greatest Threads
Greatest
Lobby
Lobby
Journals
Journals
Search
Search
Options
Options
Help
Help
Login
Login
Home » Discuss » Journals » underpants » Read entry Donate to DU
Advertise Liberally! The Liberal Blog Advertising Network
Advertise on more than 70 progressive blogs!
underpants's Journal
Posted by underpants in Editorials & Other Articles
Wed Nov 29th 2006, 02:13 PM
This is an issue that many in the rightwing world have notice that this is an issue about which Speaker-elect Pelosi has not made any comment.

In search of an answer to this I did some research.

As many of you know the Big Foot problem first arose in the mid-70's at a time when the Democrats also had majorities in the House and Senate. Coincidence? We will explore this later. For now you should just be aware that this is basically a Dem problem and some people say it is for the Democrats to clean up now that they are accountable and in power.

Background
The Big Foot is most notably seen in the upper NorthWest of the US. This leads some to believe that they are some sort of super Canadian operative. Perhaps they are a part of the English goal of reclaiming “the colonies” perhaps their roots go back further than that, to the French. As alarming as that might be let us stick with the present and what we know.

This graphic depiction offers some up close insight to the problem at hand. A problem that appears to have the potential to grow even worse.



If we pull back we see this national crisis in more broad terms. Unfortunately the best representation of this is from geocities-please click in the link now before reading the analysis that follows.

Image

We clearly see that the Big Foot problem is most notable along the westcoast. Some have noted that this region’s Democratic leanings and the timing of the origin of this problem (as documented above) concluding that the prevalence of Big Foots is no accident.

The large amount of Big Foots in Texas would seem to counter that line of reason until one looks closer at the sightings in Texas.

It is clear that a vast majority of the sightings are closer to the Mississippi river than not leading many to believe that they have boats. The reddish coloring of Arkansas and Missouri seem to support this. The proximity to the Gulf of Mexico has even suggested to some a correlation with the Bermuda Triangle.

Back to the US overall Big Foot map we notice a couple of other things.

Ohio’s heavy concentration may indicate the here to fore unknown ability of the Big Foot to swim, or at least a greater ability that previously documented.

The reddish hue of the Northeast states, to some, further supports the Democrat/Big Foot theories as established in regards to the west coast (see above).

The Florida data may indicate retirees or the aforementioned boats theory.

It is clear to see that the Democrats have a long way to go in resolving this issue.
Will they be able to succeed where they have failed in the past?
Will they be able to cut loose from the special interest groups’ long history on this issue?

The time to act is now. A country’s future hangs in the balance.
Discuss (30 comments) | Recommend ( votes)
Visitor Tools
Use the tools below to keep track of updates to this Journal.
 
Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals  |  Campaigns  |  Links  |  Store  |  Donate
About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.