|
unhappycamper's Journal
![]() US Fed Up With Troops Dying to Prop Up Karzai by Paul McGeouh in Kabul Published on Friday, November 6, 2009 by The Sydney Morning Herald It seems that Hamid Karzai just can't be trusted on his own. When he breasted the microphone at the presidential palace on October 20, to make an oblique admission that he attempted to steal the election and would go along with the second poll which he had resisted for weeks, he was flanked by a high-powered international posse - lest he depart from the agreed script. On one side was the US senator John Kerry; on the other, the United Nations special envoy Kai Eide; and riding shotgun were the British and French ambassadors. Fast forward two weeks. Last Sunday, Karzai's challenger, Dr Abdullah Abdullah, played exquisite politics. Baling out of the second vote which was to be held today, he left a wounded Karzai to claim the presidency, knowing that the stench of a million stolen votes would cling to him for the next five years. On Tuesday, Karzai was back on the presidential dais, this time to claim his prize. But lest he make any reckless promises - say, to eject some of the more odorous among his cronies from office - the enforcers came from among the cronies, his vice presidents Karim Khalil and Mohammad Qasim Fahim, both former warlords from the ranks of Afghanistan's looting class. Rest of article at: http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2009/... We are already at nine American deaths this month and it's only the sixth of November.
If you look at previous Novembers in this occupation, 2001 --> 4 American soldiers died 2002 --> 8 American soldiers died 2003 --> 1 American soldier died 2004 --> 4 American soldiers died 2005 --> 4 American soldiers died 2006 --> 9 American soldiers died 2007 --> 22 American soldiers died 2008 --> 12 American soldiers died 2009 --> 9 American soldiers died To date in 2009, 463 American soldiers have died in the continued occupation. Things are not going well. http://icasualties.org/oef/ Eielson airmen Taser 81-year-old priest
By Erik Holmes Posted : Wednesday Nov 4, 2009 14:09:04 EST How many airmen does it take to arrest an 81-year-old preacher? Four, apparently — plus a Taser. Airmen from the 354th Security Forces Squadron at Eielson Air Force Base, Alaska, used a Taser on an elderly man on Oct. 29 after the man allegedly resisted arrest and assaulted one of the airmen during a routine traffic stop. ~snip~ The airmen gave chase and got Wilcox to pull over once again, according to the News-Miner, but he refused to get out of his car. When he did finally get out of the car and the airmen tried to handcuff him, he allegedly resisted arrest and pushed one of the airmen. After warning him several times, the paper reported, one of the airmen used a Taser on Wilcox to subdue him. Rest of article at: http://www.airforcetimes.com/news/2009/11/... / unhappycamper comment: This tasing of an 81-year-old man proves that Eielson airmen are p**ssies. ![]() Homeless veterans in Las Vegas, who are working with U.S. Vets to get back on their feet, play dominoes in the shade of a parking garage in September. VA unveils strategy to end homelessness among veterans By Megan McCloskey, Stars and Stripes European edition,Tuesday, November 4, 2009 WASHINGTON — Veterans Affairs Secretary Eric Shinseki said he learned long ago never to speak in absolutes, but on Tuesday he unveiled a bold new strategy to get every homeless veteran off the streets within five years. “When I say a goal of zero homeless veterans in five years, it sure sounds like an absolute,” Shinseki said at the start of a three-day gathering of service providers fighting homelessness. “But I do that with an understanding that unless we set ambitious targets for ourselves we would not, we all would not be giving this our best efforts. No one who has served this nation as veterans have should be living on the streets.” There are more than 130,000 homeless veterans, Shinseki said, and without a change to the status quo, the number could increase 10 to 15 percent in the next five years. The plan is more a call to action, an acknowledgement that the next five years are crucial in turning the tide on veteran homelessness, particularly with the increasing number of Iraq and Afghanistan veterans showing up on the streets. The VA is still crafting the details of how to reach the lofty goals, but the plan involves a complete overhaul of the department’s traditional framework, shifting to a focus on prevention and housing instead of on shelter services. Rest of article at: http://www.stripes.com/article.asp?section... Everything Points to War
Junge Welt, Germany Translated By Ron Argentati 30 October 2009 Edited by Alex Brewer On Wednesday, President Barack Obama signed the $680 billion defense budget for 2010 into law. Of that, $130 billion is earmarked for military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan and the remainder is for special purposes, such as the “defense” of the United States. With that budget, military expenditures under Nobel Peace Prize winner Obama reached an all-time high in America. An attachment to the budget is purported to ensure more legal rights for terrorist suspects interned at Guantanamo. In reality, Obama’s “improvements” will just extend the activities of the U.S. Military Commission that have already been called illegal, both in the United States and internationally. The mainstream Associated Press (AP) news agency even titled their report, “Obama Revives Guantanamo Military Tribunals.” Just hours after he took office last January, Obama suspended the military commission at Guantanamo and promised to close the whole facility within a year. But until now the “BushBama” administration, as many critics call it because of the continuation of Bush’s criminal policies, has done very little to close the notorious torture facility. Even the handful of changes made to the law have already been sharply criticized by U.S. civil and constitutional lawyers. Jameel Jaffer, an attorney with the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) has pointed out, for example, that the new rules still permit the prosecution of minors by the military tribunals and the commission. Even if Guantanamo were to be later closed, it would make “little difference because the (illegal) procedures and directives that have become the hallmark of the compound would still exist,” Jaffer said in testimony on Wednesday. The reality is that Obama’s “improvements” only consist of a few cosmetic changes to the criminal prosecution system of men who can be declared “unlawful enemy combatants” on suspicion alone. Under George W. Bush, people placed in that category lost all legal rights previously guaranteed by U.S. and international standards. Under the new regulation, prisoners can now make requests of their court-appointed defense lawyers and confessions gained through torture or hearsay evidence are no longer admissible. But other than that, little has changed under Obama. People can disappear into the prison camp and continue to be held indefinitely without a hearing or trial. In the meantime, the latest defense budget line item that will pay Taliban members considerable sums of money to switch sides has to be seen as an act of desperation. And Obama’s procrastination on ramping up troop strength in Afghanistan by 40,000 additional soldiers only signifies confusion and a failed strategy. Article at: http://watchingamerica.com/News/36652/ever... Weapons sales are on the rise in Latin America
By Juan O. Tamayo | The Miami Herald Posted on Monday, November 2, 2009 Whether it's called an "arms race" or a "coincidental modernization" of existing stocks, a wave of weapons purchases by Latin American nations is causing neighbors to watch each other with growing mistrust and fear. Brazil says it must protect its new-found oil and gas riches. Venezuela says the U.S. military might attack it. Colombia is worried by Venezuela, Ecuador is watching Colombia and Paraguay is keeping an eye on Bolivia. There's no question that weapons sales around the region are soaring. They almost doubled in just five years, from $24 billion in 2003 to $47 billion last year, according to one report by Colombian analyst Javier Loaiza. Others put the 2008 total at $60 billion. U.S. government officials are monitoring the deals with a level of concern but avoid the term "arms race." One said he preferred to call it a "coincidental modernization of existing stocks" to reflect the absence so far of widespread tit-for-tat arms purchases. "They're buying big-ticket items but the data shows we're not yet at an arms race," said one top Obama administration official who monitors Latin America. Only four countries account for 80 percent of all the arms purchases -- Brazil, Venezuela, Chile and Colombia -- and 80-85 percent of the region's military expenditures go to salaries and pensions, not weapons, added the official, who asked for anonymity to speak frankly on the issue. Resto f article at: http://www.mcclatchydc.com/world/story/781... unhappycamper comment: I'd be willing to bet the unnamed Obama official is a dubya leftover. Self-described Taliban fighters pose in October 2006 in Zabul province, Afghanistan. A U.S. military commander says there is a "wildfire" of foreign insurgent support coming into Afghanistan, and it's not all coming from Pakistan. Cross-border insurgents flood Afghanistan By Sean D. Naylor - Staff writer Posted : Saturday Oct 31, 2009 13:41:24 EDT KABUL — The expansion of Islamic extremist groups across the Afghanistan-Pakistan region is “the worst I’ve seen it,” with Afghan insurgents receiving help from Iranian operatives and “very possibly” freelancing Pakistani intelligence agents, as well as a small but growing number of “deadly” foreign fighters, said Maj. Gen. Mike Flynn, director of intelligence for Gen. Stanley McChrystal’s headquarters here. “I wouldn’t say it’s out of control right now, but this is a California wildfire and we’re having to bring in firemen from New York,” said Flynn, who has been tracking Islamic extremism for at least eight years in postings as director of intelligence for Joint Task Force 180 (in Afghanistan), Joint Special Operations Command, Central Command and the Joint Staff. The U.S. intelligence community estimates that 19,000 to 27,000 insurgents are operating in Afghanistan, a roughly tenfold increase from 2004’s estimate of 1,700 to 3,200, said Flynn, who was brought in by McChrystal to head up intelligence operations for NATO’s International Security Assistance Force and is considered one of the four-star general’s closest confidantes here. Flynn compared the latest numbers with an intelligence community report in October 2001 — the month after the Sept. 11 attacks, when the Taliban still ruled Afghanistan — that estimated the Taliban army’s strength at 33,000 to 35,000, “with potentially up to 20,000 reserve fighters.” “I’m not a big one to match numbers, but what I look at is their capacity,” Flynn said. “So the Taliban existed as a government — they had an army, it was defeated … and then we basically screwed this thing up. And what we did was we allowed it to come back, and when we really, really missed it. Rest of article at: http://www.armytimes.com/news/2009/10/mili... / unhappycamper comment: This either an Epic Fail or Mission Accomplished moment. ![]() Gulf War veteran Tinamarie Polverari greeted a fellow resident at Jackie K's House for homeless women veterans. For these women veterans, a home to call their own By Brian MacQuarrie Globe Staff / October 31, 2009 NORTHAMPTON - An oversized stuffed tiger lies across a bedspread in a brightly colored room where Tinamarie Polverari has draped a New York Yankees cap on a lampshade. She feels safe here. Polverari, a 38-year-old Army veteran, lives in a duplex cottage run by the nonprofit group Soldier On. A victim of repeated rapes during the Gulf War, she returned in 1993 to an unhinged civilian life of heroin, crack cocaine, and desperate homelessness. She is among a growing legion of female veterans who have turned to the street after a failed transition from military to civilian life. At a time when women are assuming an ever-expanding role in the armed forces, the number of homeless female veterans is rising. Women last year accounted for an estimated 5 percent of all homeless veterans, or 6,500 former servicewomen, a figure that is 67 percent higher than the number reported in 2004, according to the US Department of Veterans Affairs. By contrast, the total number of homeless veterans decreased by 33 percent in the same period, to 131,000 from 195,000. Rest of article at: http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachus... / unhappycamper comment: Somewhere between 25% to 30% of female veterans have been raped or sexually harassed. U.S. combat injuries rise sharply
y Ann Scott Tyson Washington Post Staff Writer Saturday, October 31, 2009 More than 1,000 American troops have been wounded in battle over the past three months in Afghanistan, accounting for one-fourth of those injured in combat since the U.S.-led invasion in 2001. The dramatic increase in amputees and other seriously injured service members comes as October marks the deadliest month for U.S. troops in Afghanistan. Expanded military operations, a near-doubling of the number of troops since the beginning of the year and a Taliban offensive that has included a proliferation of roadside bombings have led to the great increase in casualties. U.S. troops in Afghanistan are suffering wounds at a higher rate than those who were serving in Iraq when violence spiraled during the military "surge" two years ago. In mid-2007, 600 U.S. troops were wounded in Iraq each month out of about 150,000 troops deployed there. In Afghanistan, about 68,000 troops are currently installed, with about 350 wounded each month recently. Pentagon press secretary Geoff Morrell acknowledged that the casualties in Afghanistan have surpassed Iraq surge proportions and noted that the violence in Afghanistan is directed more against U.S. and other coalition forces, whereas it was heavily sectarian in Iraq. "It shows you how we are the targets and how effectively they are targeting us," Morrell said. He noted that Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates has become concerned about the rising number of wounded and has ordered thousands of additional support troops to Afghanistan to look for, and minimize, the roadside bombs. Rest of article at: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/conte... margotb822 asked this question: What happened to actual filibusters?
The threat of the filibuster is enough to make Harry Ried's balls shrink to the size of peas. The Dems say: Oh noes, a filibuster! Here's my simplistic solution to the filibuster: Go for it. I'll even send you fuckers couple of Boston phone books in case you're short of reading material. How about other folks sending their phonebooks to Republicans? I want to see you motherfuckers on C-SPAN filibustering 24/7. Fuck doing other business like allocating more money for the occupations or more money for the MIC to build/create/research/refurbish death machines. Let the party of NO have their say. Explain why health care is not for everybody. Please? 140,000 troops are not enough
Arif Ayub Published: October 28, 2009 Reports on General McChrystal’s request for a further 40,000 US troops to stabilise the situation in Afghanistan are an indicator of how precarious circumstances have become. The Taliban now have a presence in nearly 70 percent of Afghanistan, almost completely dominating the Pashtun areas. The increase in US troop deployment, if approved, would bring the strength of foreign troops in Afghanistan to nearby 140,000 - matching the Soviet presence in the eighties. However, the results of such an increase are likely to be just as dismal, particularly since the US is also committing the same mistakes as the Soviets. This is quite unfortunate because the US started its mission with the support of the international community and the majority of Afghans. However, the mission soon morphed from a nation building and counter-terrorism exercise to a counter-insurgency. While General McChrystal’s “Initial Assessment Report” is exceptional in its analysis and recommendations, the timing is unfortunately eight years too late. What the general has recommended is what should have been done immediately after the US removal of the Taliban. However, the shift of US focus to Iraq and the almost complete absence of the massive infrastructural development expected by the Afghans have completely changed the dynamics of the ground realities. This was exhibited during the recent elections where only the massive stuffing of ballot boxes, particularly in the Pashtun areas, could ensure a ‘victory’ for President Karzai. General McChrystal has correctly analysed that the US objective must be the population. The request for extra troops is, however, an admission that the US has so far failed to provide the necessary security umbrella under which economic development and political reconciliation could take place. Guerrilla war is predominantly a political war and the crux of its success or failure resides in the support of the population. Mao’s primer for guerrilla movements put forward the idea that guerrilla war is basically a political war with the military aspect being utilised only to reinforce a decision, which has already been won on the ground in political terms. In broad terms, military doctrine has six components. On the tangible level there are the weapons systems, the supply systems and manpower. The intangibles are space, time and will. Mao’s military problem was how to organise space so that it could be made to yield time. His political problem was how to organise time so that it could be made to yield will. Mao’s real military problem was not that of getting the war over with but that of keeping it going. This is the contradiction the US is also faced with in Afghanistan. Conventional military forces have struggled with this dilemma and tried to overcome the problem by concretising the intangibles of space and will. Force to space ratio (combatants per square mile) was introduced as a tangible, which would deny the guerrillas their space and sanctuaries, while excessive attrition of their cadres would seek to break their will. Time continued to be a parameter out of control of conventional military forces. In the unsuccessful insurgencies the balance of forces ultimately tipped the scales. In Malaya, the British built up a regular force to space ratio (combatants per square mile) of seven and a ratio of 30 regulars per guerrilla. Experience has shown that a regular force to space ratio (combatants per square mile) of five and ten regulars per guerrilla ratio is normally sufficient to overcome the inherent intangible advantages of the guerrilla forces. The exception was in Algeria where despite 20 regulars per guerrilla, the French had to grant independence. This shows the primacy of the political framework in guerrilla warfare and, in particular, domestic public opinion in their home countries, which military planners are unable to control. The US is particularly vulnerable in this area every four years, which makes it difficult to fight wars which would take generations to settle, like in Afghanistan. Rest of article at: http://www.nation.com.pk/pakistan-news-new... Russia to Fill Iraq, Afghan Helo Orders
October 26, 2009 Knight Ridder/Tribune Thanks to the Pentagon and most likely the American taxpayer, the skies of Afghanistan will again be filled with the distinctive noise of Russian helicopters. So too will the skies of Iraq, and the contracts for these choppers have caught the attention of Sen. Richard Shelby, R-Ala. Shelby fired off a letter to U.S. Defense Secretary William Gates this week to try to figure out how much of the more than $800 million spent buying Russian made Mi-17s was taxpayer funded. He also wants to know why, in particular, the contract for Iraq was awarded without a bid. Which has Shelby and others wondering why U.S. helicopter makers couldn't have taken a shot at filling these orders. In December of 2007, a contract was given for 22 Mi-17s to a Maryland defense broker ARINC to enable Iraq to buy the helicopters. Rest of article at: http://www.military.com/news/article/russi... unhappycamper comment: Shelby you ignorant fuck. Who do you think is paying for everything in the sandbox?![]() U.S. soldiers escort Afghan detainees, who were rounded up for the bombing death of an American bomb technician in Wardak province, at Bagram Air Field on October 12. The detainees were then handed over to Afghan intelligence officials for prosecution in a judicial system described by U.S. officers as a "catch and release" program. U.S. forces struggle with Washington’s perceptions and reality in Afghanistan By Dianna Cahn, Stars and Stripes Mideast edition, Friday, October 23, 2009 WARDAK PROVINCE, Afghanistan — American soldiers are fighting a war in Afghanistan. But it’s not just against the Taliban. A U.S. counter-explosives staff sergeant was killed recently trying to defuse a complex homemade bomb planted in the road in this hostile region. But legal and forensics experts had to jump through regulatory hoops set up by their own chain of command just to ensure that the Afghan suspects in the bombing would face prosecution. Americans fighting shadowy Taliban insurgents embedded within the wary civilian population here put their lives on the line to build up a local police force. But those Afghan police officers frequently release suspected insurgents because of bribes, tribal allegiances or threats of retaliation. And sometimes the police themselves target U.S. soldiers. A munitions supply officer recently pointed out that because of budget cuts, American bomb technicians are no longer getting a full supply of the C-4 explosives they use to destroy the homemade Taliban bombs. As public support for the Afghan war, which is in its ninth year, withers back home and President Barack Obama deliberates whether to commit even more U.S. forces to the faltering struggle, morale among American troops is flagging. Rest of article at: http://www.stripes.com/article.asp?section... unhappycamper comment: Let me see if I have this straight. We are sending a squadron of $70 million dollar Ospreys to Afghanistan and we don't have enough money to buy C-4 to blow up IEDs? Gimmeafuckingbreak. Give it up guys.. Fuck dithering - it's time to declare victory and come home. Depleted Uranium: The Dead Babies in Iraq and Afghanistan Are No Joke
by Dave Lindorff | October 20, 2009 - 10:25am The horrors of the US Agent Orange defoliation campaign in Vietnam, about which I wrote on Oct. 15, could ultimately be dwarfed by the horrors caused by the depleted uranium weapons which the US began using in the 1991 Gulf War (300 tons), and which it has used much more extensively--and in more urban, populated areas--in the Iraq War and the now intensifying Afghanistan War. Depleted uranium, despite its rather benign-sounding name, is not depleted of radioactivity or toxicity. The term "depleted" refers only to its being depleted of the U-235 isotope needed for fission reactions in nuclear reactors. The nuclear waste material from nuclear power plants, DU as it is known, is what is removed from the power plants' spent fuel rods and is essentially composed of the uranium isotope U-238 as well as U-236 (a product of nuclear reactor fission, not found in nature), as well as other trace radioactive elements. Once simply a nuisance for the industry, that still has no permanent way to dispose of the dangerous stuff, it turns out to be an ideal metal for a number of weapons uses, and has been capitalized on by the Pentagon. 1.7 times heavier than lead, and much harder than steel, and with the added property of burning at a super-hot temperature, DU has proven to be an ideal penetrator for warheads that need to pierce thick armor or dense concrete bunkers made of reinforced concrete and steel. Once through the defenses, it burns at a temperature that incinerates anyone inside (which is why we see the carbonized bodies of bodies in the wreckage of Iraqi tanks hit by US fire). Accordingly it has found its way into 30 mm machine gun ammunition, especially that used by the A-10 Warthog ground-attack fighter planes used extensively in Iraq and Afghanistan (as well as Kosovo). It is also the warhead of choice for Abrams tanks and is also reportedly used in GBU-28 and the later GBU-37 bunker buster bombs, each of which can have 1-2 tons of the stuff in its warhead. DU is also used as ballast in cruise missiles, and this burns up when a missile detonates its conventional explosive. Some cruise missiles are also designed to hit hardened targets and reportedly feature DU warheads, as does the AGM-130 air-to-ground missile, which carries a one-ton penetrating warhead. In addition, depleted uranium is used in large quantities in the armor of tanks and other equipment. This material becomes a toxic source of CU pollution when these vehicles are attacked and burned. While the Pentagon has continued to claim, against all scientific evidence, that there is no hazard posed by depleted uranium, US troops in Iraq have reportedly been instructed to avoid any sites where these weapons have been used--destroyed Iraqi tanks, exploded bunkers, etc.--and to wear masks if they do have to approach. Many torched vehicles have been brought back to the US, where they have been buried in special sites reserved for dangerously contaminated nuclear materials. (Thousands of tons of DU-contaminated sand from Kuwait, polluted with DU during the US destruction of Iraq's tank forces in the 1991 war, were removed and shipped to a waste site in Idaho last year with little fanfare.) Suspiciously, international health officials have been prevented or obstructed from doing medical studies of DU sites in Iraq and Afghanistan. But an excellent series of articles several years ago by the Christian Science Monitor described how reporters from that newspaper had visited such sites in Iraq with Geiger-counters and had found them to be extremely "hot" with radioactivity. The big danger with DU is not as a pure metal, but after it has exploded and burned, when the particles of uranium oxide, which are just as radioactive as the pure isotopes, can be inhaled or ingested. Even the smallest particle of uranium in the body is both deadly poisonous as a chemical, and over time can cause cancer--particularly in the lungs, but also the kidneys, testes and ovaries. There are reports of a dramatic increase in the incidence of deformed babies being born in the city of Fallujah, where DU weapons were in wide use during the November 2004 assault on that city by US Marines. The British TV station SKY UK, in a report last month that has received no mention in any mainstream American news organization, found a marked increase in birth defects at local hospitals. Birth defects have also been high for years in the Basra area in the south of Iraq, where DU was used not just during America's 2003 "shock and awe" attack on Iraq, but also in the 1991 Gulf War. Rest of article at: http://smirkingchimp.com/thread/24461 An air bridge to Afghanistan is growing more important
By Chuck Crumbo | The State Posted on Sunday, October 18, 2009 CHARLESTON AIR FORCE BASE, S.C. -- The C-5A transport's four engines let out a collective groan as the gigantic plane lifted off the runway and climbed into the evening sky, hugging the South Carolina coastline. Inside the plane's cavernous cargo bay -- strapped to its steel deck -- were two vehicle simulators, designed to teach U.S. troops how to survive rollover crashes, and pallets of food and water. In less than 24 hours, the cargo would reach Afghanistan for distribution to remote U.S. bases on the country's desert floor and rocky cliffs. For eight years, Charleston has been a starting point for the 7,500-mile-long air bridge to the Afghan war. Eleven times a day, on average, Air Force C-5 and C-17 military transport aircraft take off from Charleston for Afghanistan. Rest of article at: http://www.mcclatchydc.com/world/story/773... unhappycamper comment: 8 x 365 x 11 = 32,120 flights to Afghanistan. That's gotta be burning some gas. |
Profile Information unhappycamper
Blogroll Greatest Threads
The ten most recommended threads posted
on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums in the
last 24 hours. For the millionth time, THERE IS NO PUBLIC OPTION 166 recs : By debbierlus "Wal-Mart is Your God Now"-WM Goes Crazy on (Innocent) Couple Accused of Shoplifting 150 recs : By XanaDUer For those of us who have had an abortion... 142 recs : By luvspeas I do not support this bill 94 recs : By AllentownJake HOUSE PASSES HEALTH CARE BILL!! 91 recs : By tomm2thumbs A nostalgic look at the Old Democratic Party. 55 recs : By bvar22 Dennis Kucinich: Why I voted no on 3962 51 recs : By debbierlus Official FUCK YOU HOUSE REPUBLICANS thread. 47 recs : By tridim 'Going Rouge' The Sarah Palin Coloring Book 39 recs : By symbolman God Bless you Dennis 33 recs : By AllentownJake My Forums
Democratic Underground forums
and groups from my "My Forums" list.
Visitor Tools
Use the tools below to keep track of updates to this Journal.
Discussion Forums
Big Forums
More Forums
Today's Featured Forums
|

