Latest Threads
Latest
Greatest Threads
Greatest
Lobby
Lobby
Journals
Journals
Search
Search
Options
Options
Help
Help
Login
Login
Home » Discuss » Journals » warren pease » Read entry Donate to DU
Advertise Liberally! The Liberal Blog Advertising Network
Advertise on more than 70 progressive blogs!
Warren Pease's Journal
Posted by warren pease in General Discussion
Tue Jul 14th 2009, 07:37 PM
... all but two of whom died between "the events of 9/11"(tm) and Feb. 5, 2005. There may be more by now, but this is the most comprehensive list I could find. It's called, with unparalleled respect for the deceased, "Dead Scientists."

An impressive list, I'm told, although I have absolutely no idea who any of them are/were before the fact.

Here's the brief bio on Kelly:

July 18, 2003: Dr. David Kelly, 59
--Expertise: Biological warfare weapons specialist, senior post at the Ministry of Defense, an expert on DNA sequencing when he was head of microbiology at Porton Down and worked with two American scientists, Benito Que, 52, and Don Wiley, 57.
--Helped Vladimir Pasechnik found Regma Biotechnologies, which has a contract with the U.S. Navy for "the diagnostic and therapeutic treatment of anthrax"
--Circumstance of Death: He was found dead after seemingly slashing his wrist in a wooded area near his home at Southmoor, Oxfordshire.


And this interesting observation on the subject, excerpted from this article on "Whatreallyhappened.com":

Now, statistically, it's possible, even likely, that one or two of these microbiologists legitimately were killed in random accidents. But for so many to die in such a short while exceeds all reasonable bounds of statistics. Prudence would demand an investigation, not the "ho hum" attitude of the government which even today continues to issue dire warnings to the general population of how much we are all in danger from "bioterrorism".

So, let's take a moment and step away from the perpetual fear-mongering of the media and assume that some party has indeed decided to "liquidate" weapons research infectious disease experts.

There is really only one reason to kill off a bunch of scientists. To keep them from doing something they are able to do.

What were these scientists able to do? Maybe blow the whistle if an artificially created disease was about to be used in a manner those who created it did not approve of.

Regardless of the exact reason, there does seem to be a clear pattern of targeted microbiologists, and paired with it, an obvious government disinterest in the matter.

I leave it to you to figure out why.



Other victims of their own knowledge include Mike Connell, the IT guy who worked with Stephen Spoonamore (another good Google lookup) and the "DC Madam," Deborah Jean Palfrey.

And another guy named Barry Jennings, who claimed he was hustling to WTC 7 to see 9/11 Rudy after "the events of 9/11"(tm) and instead found a bombed-out lobby, bodies everywhere, interior walls blown apart, crumbling elevator shafts and so forth... Jennings died not long ago, sometime in Sept. 2008 shortly after his story went public for the first time.

Makes you admire Sibel Edmonds' courage a hundred times more, doesn't it…


Standard disclaimer: I have no current or past affiliation with any of the people cited above or the groups supporting the websites containing any of the above information. I've been a "troother" researcher and activist in the past, but I'm now just an interested observer.

Still, I remain absolutely fascinated by the utter bullshit that passes for the "Official Conspiracy Theory" and which has kept this country scared shitless for nearly eight years and counting -- along with the rest of the world, which is getting a little sick of the US' twitchy trigger finger and sincerely hopes it doesn't point at them any time soon.

NOTE: All sites listed above fall into the loose category of 9/11 "trooother" websites or portals. Virtually none of this has appeared in the so-called "mainstream media." Or if it has, it's been spun like the contents of a clothes dryer until it comes out so squeaky clean and content-free that any remaining facts are just accidents.

But filtration is really mass media's job, isn't it, not the free and unbiased flow of information. So the near total absence of any coverage of any of the above seems to me an endorsement rather than a sticking point.


Happy hunting,


sf
Discuss (1 comments)
Profile Information
warren pease
Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your ignore list
Not a DU Donor
3874 posts
Member since 2001
Portland, Baja Canada
Male
Proudly harassing republicans, wingnuts, blue-nosed fundie loons, xenophobes, chicken hawks, gullible American creation myth true believers, repressed reactionary bigots and countless other lower life-forms since 1967. Cats, on the other hand...
Visitor Tools
Use the tools below to keep track of updates to this Journal.
Random Journal
Random Journal
 
Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals  |  Campaigns  |  Links  |  Store  |  Donate
About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.