Latest Threads
Latest
Greatest Threads
Greatest
Lobby
Lobby
Journals
Journals
Search
Search
Options
Options
Help
Help
Login
Login
Home » Discuss » Journals » wellstone dem » Read entry Donate to DU
Advertise Liberally! The Liberal Blog Advertising Network
Advertise on more than 70 progressive blogs!
wellstone dem's Journal
Posted by wellstone dem in General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010)
Tue Jun 30th 2009, 08:15 PM
#1 We have same day registration at the polls
#2 We have an automatic recount where the election is within 1%
#3 We have a paper trail of ballots case
#4 Our secretary of state appointed 2 republican appointed judges, one independent appointed judge, and one elected judge (non-partisan election) to the canvassing board.
#5 The recount process was open to the public, my county broadcast it's count on the web
#6 The canvassing board process was open to the public and webcast
#7 Every challenged ballot was posted on the web
#8 Every ruling of the canvassing board was posted on the web
#9 Every paper filed in court has been posted on the web
#10 Much of the original recount was completed during one of the snowiest winters in Minnesota history-not one day was missed because of the weather.
#11 The District Court challenge was heard by 3 judges, one appointed by a Republican Governor, another by a Democratic Governor, the third by an Independent Governor.
#12 The District Court judges reviewed evidence that could have been piled 21 feet high. (I talked to one of the judges from the panel on Sunday.)
#13 The District Court trial was all webcast.
#14 Despite the volume of evidence, the District Court ruled in 3 months, a unanimous decision despite the multi-party affiliation of the panel.
#15 The Minnesota Supreme Court Case was webcast.
#16 The Minnesota Supreme Court, consisting of 3 GOP appointees, and 2 independent appointees, ruled unanimously, affirming the lower court decision. (Compare to Gore v. Bush judges)
#17 Although the process took a bit of time, it was transparent and thorough. No one who has paid attention can credibly argue with the result. And when you think that the difference was 300 out of 3,000,000 votes, perhaps taking a bit of time to make sure it was accurate and lawful wasn't so bad.

Congratulations Senator Franken.
Discuss (18 comments) | Recommend (+17 votes)
Greatest Threads
The ten most recommended threads posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums in the last 24 hours.
Visitor Tools
Use the tools below to keep track of updates to this Journal.
Random Journal
Random Journal
 
Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals  |  Campaigns  |  Links  |  Store  |  Donate
About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.