welshTerrier2's Journal - making America safer ?????

Advertise on more than 70 progressive blogs!

welshTerrier2's Journal

Posted by welshTerrier2 in General Discussion: Presidential
Fri Jan 19th 2007, 11:06 PM

if you've been listening to the Democrats the last couple of weeks, it's clear they are only just beginning to flex their muscles ... i've seen a number of them on the big talk shows finally standing up to bush on Iraq ... their opposition comes in all flavors but all are very free to criticize bush for the colossal mistake he made when he invaded Iraq ... i wish that translated into a more aggressive call for withdrawal of troops, but that's a topic for other posts ...

interestingly, one of the themes I've heard Democrats repeat several times or more is that invading Iraq took our focus off the "war on terror", especially in Afghanistan ... the case is being made by Democrats that the situation in Afghanistan has worsened considerably since bush "refocussed" our military into Iraq ... i think the point almost goes without saying ... the situation in Afghanistan gets worse by the day ... implicit in the Dems argument is that Iraq has not only not made us safer but it made us less safe because we failed to finish the job in Afghanistan ...

we don't seem to spend much time in this country asking about "motives" ... we seem more interested in arguing about tactics to help us catch the bad guys ... in my view, this sort of thinking is overly simplistic ... if all you do is catch some bad guys, there will always be more bad guys ... it's like that potato chip commercial: "munch all you want; we'll make more" ... has it occurred to anyone in the US power establishment to ask the very simple question: why do they want to attack us? i'll lay aside any thoughts i might have about LIHOP or MIHOP for the purpose of this analysis ... so, why would a bunch of guys from the Middle East want to attack citizens in the US? bush said it was because "they hate us for our freedoms" ... yeah, right ... you mean like they're mad because no one lets them have "casual Fridays"? or they're mad because we can write a letter to the editor complaining about what a jackass bush is? "i will kill the Americans because they are allowed to write letters" ... does this argument make sense to anyone?

the truth is they may hate us for a variety of reasons ... sure, they hate our strong support for Israel ... i won't debate that issue here ... but they also hate us for propping up tyrants in the Middle East ... they hate us for building bases and occupying their countries with our military (i'm told we have "strategic interests" in the region - i assume they mean oil) ... so, on top of all that, with all the post-911 talk in the US, what brilliant strategy has the US undertaken now? and what is the reaction of the Arab street to this brilliant strategy? i'm glad you asked ... please read this ...

the following article appeared in the United Arab Emirates press ... it was written by a Yemeni author ... does it sound like imposing the new "Oil Law" on Iraq will make America safer? while the Democrats are talking about Afghanistan, maybe they should be paying a little more attention to the new "Oil Law" in Iraq ... it is a prescription for a generation of deeper hatred between Arabs and the US ...

source: http://www.watchingamerica.com/gulfnews000...

Gulf News, United Arab Emirates
The Oil Truth and Nothing but the Oil Truth

“Under Saddam, it was impossible for any foreign company to get such a deal. This is enslavement of our country by those who say they came to liberate us.”
By Munir Daair

The coin finally dropped. Stealthily, but we heard it loud and clear.

It dropped while we were busy scratching our heads trying to figure out what plan America's current great leader, the eminent George W. Bush, has for Iraq; what truths were buried with Iraq's former great leader, the late eminent Saddam Hussain; and how bloody Iraq's civil war will become. This, after busily listening to tales of WMD's (was that Words of Mass Deception?) and the lies "we are not there for Iraq's oil", after watching the sham of Iraq's election process and the billions gone missing under the watchful eyes of the occupying powers.

THE OIL TRUTH IS NOW UNFOLDING

Everything else was just a charade for America, as it quietly drafted Iraq's new oil law that will further enrich Bush and Cheney’s oil buddies for the next 30 years. In fact, a representative of the American company, BearingPoint, has been working in the US embassy in Baghdad to "assist" with the law, which is to be approved by Iraq's parliament. This law - drafted in Washington and approved by U.S. oil companies before Iraqis themselves even heard of it - gives unprecedented partnership "rights" to American and Western oil giants. <skip>

"Under Saddam, it was impossible for any foreign company to get such a deal. This is enslavement of our country by those who say they came to liberate us. Do they think we will allow them to extract our oil and sell it on such terms? This is theft from a nation under siege, exploiting our weakness at the point of a gun. They are kicking us while we're down. I opposed Saddam, that's why I have live exiled in France all these years. But now I am not sure. Maybe Saddam was better." <skip>

CONCESSIONS

Under the new American-drafted law, the Iraqi government will offer contractual concessions up to 30 years’ long to foreign companies, using a system known as a PSA (Production Sharing Agreement). In other words, American and other Western oil companies are being allowed to exploit Iraq's current predicament and negotiate self-serving, one-sided oil PSA's that will legally commit the entire country of Iraq for the next 30 years.

So it’s no surprise that Bush will order an additional 20,000 American soldiers to risk their lives in Iraq. They will be needed to fight "terrorism" which is sure to rise as Iraqis resist the raping of their country. The world will be treated to a continuing spectacle of bloodletting. Young Iraqis dying to stop - and young Anglo/Americans dying to ensure - the transfer of Iraqi wealth to Bush and Cheney's already rich friends. <skip>

FUTURE REACTION

Oh, yes sir, we here know Iraq well - its history, its present - and we can predict its future reaction too, especially with foreign occupation.

We also know how naļve the occupying powers are. And that is also why we fear the ramifications of this latest oil law, this latest naivety, which will only provoke further bloodshed. Yet more young Iraqi and Anglo/American blood will be wasted to expand the Bush/Cheney-related bank accounts.

Discuss (1 comments) | Recommend ( votes)

Profile Information

welshTerrier2

13595 posts

Member since 2002

"The Sorrows of Empire" by Chalmers Johnson

here are the final two haunting paragraphs:

There is plenty in the world to occupy our military radicals and empire enthusiasts for the time being. But there can be no doubt that the course on which we are launched will lead us into new versions of the Bay of Pigs and updated, speeded-up replays of Vietnam War scenarios. When such disasters occur, as they - or as-yet-unknown versions of them - certainly will, a world disgusted by the betrayal of the idealism associated with the United States will welcome them, just as most people did when the former USSR came apart. Like other empires of the past century, the United States has chosen to live not prudently, in peace and prosperity, but as a massive military power athwart an angry, resistant globe.

There is one development that could conceivably stop this process of overreaching: the people could retake control of the Congress, reform it along with the corrupted elections laws that have made it into a forum for special interests, turn it into a genuine assembly of democratic representatives, and cut off the supply of money to the Pentagon and the secret intelligence agencies. We have a strong civil society that could, in theory, overcome the entrenched interests of the armed forces and the military-industrial complex. At this late date, however, it is difficult to imagine how Congress, much like the Roman senate in the last days of the republic, could be brought back to life and cleansed of its endemic corruption. Failing such a reform, Nemesis, the goddess of retribution and vengeance, the punisher of pride and hubris, waits impatiently for her meeting with us."

WT2's Core Beliefs

Here is what I believe are fundamental truths that Democrats should be fighting for:

1. the war in Iraq has no legitimacy ... if bush succeeds there, the only result will be the establishment of an American puppet ... we will not succeed; we should not succeed; we should leave NOW ...
2. there should be no room for compromising the objectives of any human liberation movement ... compromises can be made on tactics (i.e. what we will settle for today) but never on the ideal ... Democrats should speak out on all human liberation movements ...
3. our democratic institutions have been poisoned by greed, wealth and power ... reform must be the number one priority of every American ... this is NOT a left-right issue; without a democratic process, nothing works ...
4. the Democratic Party must find a way to be genuinely inclusive of its left-wing ... demanding adherence to the Party line is NOT going to work ... we need major reforms in the Party to promote a better dialog between prominent party members and the grassroots ... without a real exchange of ideas and a real process of inclusion, we will not succeed ...

Visitor Tools

Use the tools below to keep track of updates to this Journal.

	Track this Journal
	Blogroll this Journal
	RSS/XML

Discussion Forums

Enter Discussion Forums

Big Forums

	Latest Breaking News
	Editorials & Other Articles
	Political Videos
	Research Forum
	General Discussion
	General Discussion: Presidential
	The DU Lounge

More Forums

	Topic Forums (35)
	State & Country Forums (56)
	DU Groups (131)

Today's Featured Forums

	September 11
	Iowa
	Ancient Wisdom and Pagan Spirituality Group
	Deaf/Hard of Hearing Group