Latest Threads
Latest
Greatest Threads
Greatest
Lobby
Lobby
Journals
Journals
Search
Search
Options
Options
Help
Help
Login
Login
Home » Discuss » Journals » welshTerrier2 » Read entry Donate to DU
Advertise Liberally! The Liberal Blog Advertising Network
Advertise on more than 70 progressive blogs!
welshTerrier2's Journal
Posted by welshTerrier2 in General Discussion
Tue May 29th 2007, 03:03 PM
You either agree with the premise that we are running out of time to save the planet or you don't. There's no "triangulation" here. It makes no sense. If global warming is a very real and imminent crisis, if our fish supplies are either disappearing or so badly poisoned and polluted it's not safe to eat them, if fossil fuels are rapidly dwindling, and if our food supply is being "privatized" by massive agribusiness, then we need to start making some very serious changes. Unfortunately, "big changes" are too often seen as incompatible with our political process. Can you imagine calling for massive cuts in the defense budget to fund mass transit? Can you imagine real urban planning to place employers closer to where people live to cut down on fuel use? Can you imagine rationing and other restrictions on our wasteful lifestyles? Do you think campaign advisors are being paid to recommend risky ideas like those?

Of course, the question remains, which is the real risky behavior? Finger-in-the-wind, play-it-safe political parties who put winning above all else are prohibiting the kinds of changes we desperately need. Some say, well, we have to get Democrats elected before we can see these kinds of changes. I'm all for electing Democrats who are pushing for these kinds of massive reforms. The problem is, they aren't. They are mired in incrementalism because they see a political value in "the political center." Political compromise MAY be good politics; there is absolutely no reason to assume it defines good policy. These are truly desperate times. What's at stake today is our ability to sustain ourselves on the planet. Or do you disagree?

The truth is, what Democrats are doing today is not laying an adequate foundation for the kinds of changes we need. It will take time to educate Americans about the sacrifices and turbulence the future, by necessity, will bring. Our bloated lifestyles, however much we may cherish them, are not sustainable. Is there political risk in being the bearer of bad news? Of course there is. But with every risk, comes potential benefits. In this case, we have no choice. My view of the politics is that, if the case is presented with integrity and clarity, the American people will reward the Democratic Party. What we're seeing today is unacceptable. What we're seeing today is putting the politics ahead of the policy. This cannot continue. In time, it will not continue because the urgency of the situation will demand answers. Democrats could really be "save the planet" heroes if they would step up to the plate and look beyond the next election. It is our job to encourage them to do that.

Do you support the following goals of the "Solartopians" (http://www.solartopia.org /)?

source: http://www.freepress.org/columns/display/7...

In the global campaign to save the Earth, a shared vision is vital.

“Solartopia” foresees a democratic, green-powered 21st Century civilization. Our economic and ecological survival depend on it.

Technologically, the vision rests on four simple pillars:

1. Total renunciation of all fossil and nuclear fuels. In a sustainable, survivable future, they are a 20th Century pox, neither green nor clean.
2. All-out conversion to renewable energy, led by the “Solartopian Trinity” of wind, solar and bio-fuels. Mother Earth gives us the natural power we need.
3. Complete commitment to maximum efficiency, including revived and solarized mass transit and passenger rail systems. Our automotive “love affair” is a hoax.
4. Zero tolerance for production of anything that cannot be re-used or recycled, including chemical-based food. Solartopia is an organic, post-pollution world.

Solartopia can't happen without transcending some primary barriers:

5. Corporations can no longer enjoy human rights without human responsibilities. Revised corporate charters must break the grip these giant economic organizations have held on our political, economic and ecological systems.
6. Population is the province of women, who in Solartopia are empowered, educated and equally paid. In synch with Mother Earth, they bring us the number of children She wishes to accommodate.
7. Where everyone has a right to the basic necessities of life, including free education, nobody starves. The Solartopian rich may be plentiful, but no civilization thrives unless all have access to sustenance and dignity.
8. Big Money is barred from the campaign process. Free and fair elections and referenda power non-violent community-based evolution. The universal right to ballots on recycled paper means accurate vote counts and recounts for all.

Solartopia demands that business serve society and the planet, rather than vice versa. Capitalism may be one thing, but Enron cannibalism is quite another. Balancing competition and the profit motive with human and ecological need, the Solartopian vision demands accountability, efficiency, service and justice.

The switch to renewables defunds global terrorism. Atomic reactors are pre-deployed weapons of radioactive mass destruction. Shutting them ends the fear of apocalyptic disaster by both terror and error. Transcending coal and cars cures much of global warming.

But everywhere we turn, the King CONG corporations build barriers. They use government subsidies and media disinformation to prolong their failed investments in obsolete technologies and the fossil/nuke fuels that run them.

Inseparable from those fuels are authoritarian power structures that produce wars for oil, financial imbalance and social chaos, leading to biological extinction.

Harvey Wasserman (www.solartopia.org ) is senior advisor to Greenpeace USA and the Nuclear Information & Resource Service, and writes regularly for www.freepress.org, where this article first appeared.
Discuss (11 comments) | Recommend (10 votes)
Profile Information
welshTerrier2
Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your ignore list
13595 posts
Member since 2002
"The Sorrows of Empire" by Chalmers Johnson
here are the final two haunting paragraphs:


There is plenty in the world to occupy our military radicals and empire enthusiasts for the time being. But there can be no doubt that the course on which we are launched will lead us into new versions of the Bay of Pigs and updated, speeded-up replays of Vietnam War scenarios. When such disasters occur, as they - or as-yet-unknown versions of them - certainly will, a world disgusted by the betrayal of the idealism associated with the United States will welcome them, just as most people did when the former USSR came apart. Like other empires of the past century, the United States has chosen to live not prudently, in peace and prosperity, but as a massive military power athwart an angry, resistant globe.

There is one development that could conceivably stop this process of overreaching: the people could retake control of the Congress, reform it along with the corrupted elections laws that have made it into a forum for special interests, turn it into a genuine assembly of democratic representatives, and cut off the supply of money to the Pentagon and the secret intelligence agencies. We have a strong civil society that could, in theory, overcome the entrenched interests of the armed forces and the military-industrial complex. At this late date, however, it is difficult to imagine how Congress, much like the Roman senate in the last days of the republic, could be brought back to life and cleansed of its endemic corruption. Failing such a reform, Nemesis, the goddess of retribution and vengeance, the punisher of pride and hubris, waits impatiently for her meeting with us."
WT2's Core Beliefs
Here is what I believe are fundamental truths that Democrats should be fighting for:

1. the war in Iraq has no legitimacy ... if bush succeeds there, the only result will be the establishment of an American puppet ... we will not succeed; we should not succeed; we should leave NOW ...
2. there should be no room for compromising the objectives of any human liberation movement ... compromises can be made on tactics (i.e. what we will settle for today) but never on the ideal ... Democrats should speak out on all human liberation movements ...
3. our democratic institutions have been poisoned by greed, wealth and power ... reform must be the number one priority of every American ... this is NOT a left-right issue; without a democratic process, nothing works ...
4. the Democratic Party must find a way to be genuinely inclusive of its left-wing ... demanding adherence to the Party line is NOT going to work ... we need major reforms in the Party to promote a better dialog between prominent party members and the grassroots ... without a real exchange of ideas and a real process of inclusion, we will not succeed ...
Visitor Tools
Use the tools below to keep track of updates to this Journal.
 
Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals  |  Campaigns  |  Links  |  Store  |  Donate
About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.